Tuesday, February 15, 2005

What Eason Jordan Said

and what Eason Jordan was trying to say:

Yes, it is a war. And, yes, in war there is "collateral damage." But there has been a lot of (at the very least circumstantial) evidence that journalists are more at risk in this war than others. An inordinate number have been killed--many from Arab media outlets.

The right-wing media claim Jordan's scalp, and perhaps they're right about "taking him out." But this begs the question about Jordan's statements, whether they were taken out of context, or misinterpreted, or whatever. Was he, in fact, accusing American troops of assassinating journalists? Or passing on stories from other journalists who believe that they as a group are threatened by American forces?

On the face of it, nothing Jordan said sounded particularly shocking to me--what was shocking was that he momentarily lost control and said it. A lot of what is going on in our country is about control, and control of information is no small part of it. If it were American policy to control information coming out of Iraq by threat of violence, would anyone in this administration admit it? Of course not. The only answer is for someone--and, traditionally, this would have been the role of journalists--to investigate these charges. The US has not been investigating them.

Here are some facts:

In addition, allegations have been made that journalists have been subject to arrests without cause and other harrassment:

Eliminating journalists

"The images from last month's siege on Falluja came almost exclusively from reporters embedded with US troops. This is because Arab journalists who had covered April's siege from the civilian perspective had effectively been eliminated. Al-Jazeera had no cameras on the ground because it has been banned from reporting in Iraq indefinitely. Al-Arabiya did have an unembedded reporter, Abdel Kader Al-Saadi, in Falluja, but on November 11 US forces arrested him and held him for the length of the siege. Al-Saadi's detention has been condemned by Reporters Without Borders and the International Federation of Journalists. 'We cannot ignore the possibility that he is being intimidated for just trying to do his job,' the IFJ stated.

"It's not the first time journalists in Iraq have faced this kind of intimidation. When US forces invaded Baghdad in April 2003, US Central Command urged all unembedded journalists to leave the city. Some insisted on staying and at least three paid with their lives. On April 8, a US aircraft bombed al-Jazeera's Baghdad offices, killing reporter Tareq Ayyoub. Al-Jazeera has documentation proving it gave the coordinates of its location to US forces.

"On the same day, a US tank fired on the Palestine hotel, killing Jose Couso, of the Spanish network Telecinco, and Taras Protsiuk, of Reuters. Three US soldiers are facing a criminal lawsuit from Couso's family, which alleges that US forces were well aware that journalists were in the Palestine hotel and that they committed a war crime. "

1 comment:

jimbo said...

Perhaps truth is indeed the first casualty of war...